How long to write googolplex
No, though people may say infinity is the largest number because it goes on forever but infinity is NOT a number. It would take about a googolplex - it doesn't make much difference, in this case, whether you are talking about googolplex of nanoseconds, seconds, or millennia.
Nor does it make much difference whether you count a million numbers every second, or take a year for each number. In any case, it would be much, much more than the current age of the Universe.
Very probably: a long time!! It depends on the speed of your counting though, and whether you're counting up in 1s or in googolplexes. That means that in one second you can count , digits. That's years, or One Quintillion years Simply put, if you started counting at light speed the second the Big Bang you'd still be nowhere NEAR googolplex. And larger still is the Googolplexplex and the Graham's Number. Longer than you can live. If you write really slow, about 2 hours, but if you write really fast, then about 1 hour.
Well a googol is a 1 in front of zeros. Therefore a googolplex is 1 in front of a googol amount of zeros. If we were to write it out it would take up aprox. It will depend on the writer as to how long it takes to write a screenplay for animation. It could take several weeks to even years. Longer than the human lifespan. If the first humans on the planet started counting and instructed their descendants to keep going and the instructions came down all the way through history to you, you still wouldn't be able to come close.
Assuming you could average one per second without a break, it would take about twelve days. Log in. Math and Arithmetic. Study now. See Answer. Best Answer. Study guides. Algebra 20 cards. A polynomial of degree zero is a constant term. The grouping method of factoring can still be used when only some of the terms share a common factor A True B False.
The sum or difference of p and q is the of the x-term in the trinomial. A number a power of a variable or a product of the two is a monomial while a polynomial is the of monomials. J's study guide 1 card. What is the name of Steve on minecraft's name.
Steel Tip Darts Out Chart 96 cards. Q: How long would it take to write a googolplex? Write your answer Mathematics has the power not only to define the unimaginable but to investigate it too. Rachel Thomas and Marianne Freiberger are the editors of Plus. This article is an edited extract from their new book Numericon: A journey through the hidden lives of numbers. OK now the question is how does the expansion for different numbers work.
Googolplexitoll, Googolplexigong is larger than googolplex. Omega is even larger than infinity! They all follow the same pattern. For up arrows, you just have one less up arrow than in the original problem. Put that back in your other problem.
Unimaginably big. And that's only with only 4 up arrows. Thanks for posting the correct definition. People should NOT comment unless they know what they are talking about. If you take a little time and watch Numberphile on YouTube, you can see Graham himself define the number.
Your explanation was the correct one. Thank you for not saying something stupid. Basically the number of arrows tell you the amount of times you repeat the operations that come before it. Long story short the arrow just tells you to take the process used for the previous number of arrows and use a repeated form of that.
The difference between the towers is the height. The first tower is 3 high the same as the base number , and once that is multiplied out, that is the HEIGHT of the next one. This continues forth. It just iterates upwards. Great explanation, but I'm somewhat puzzled by the fact that you never actually told us how Graham's number is defined. It's like there's a missing paragraph after you finish explaining the rapid recursive growth of up-arrows. That's "Step 1".
Well beyond numbers anyone can really hope to imagine in any meaningfully representative way without deep mathematical understanding, this completes Step 2. Anyway, that's what I think an explanation might look like; I'm surprised something like this wasn't included.
Otherwise, great explanation,. Graham went one step further. However, that number is called "g1". That is "g2". Are you sitting down? Graham's Number is g64!!! They are not the same thing. Actual up arrows shouldn't be shown in it because like you said they don't mean the same thing. W by the way you just made a argument waiting to happen by saying "They are not the same thing. Yeah graham's number is huge, but not as big as a googolplexian, which is a one followed by a googolplex number of zeros.
In fact, the googolplexian is the largest number that has a name. Man I was curious about googol then I stumbled on googolplex then I noticed it was only the 2nd biggest number according to google then I found out about grahams number bloody hell i f I ever get cocky about my intelligence I'll just think about grahams number and think about how confusing it is man I don't think I'll be able to sleep at night I wish I had just stuct to studying pi multiplied by the radius squared.
Actually, Graham's number is now considered pretty small by mathematicians. For example, TREE 3 is so big that it makes Graham's number look like pretty much like zero in comparison. The interesting thing about the TREE function is that it grows so rapidly eg. I don't think so, but I didn't count the arrows. Big, but I think it doesn't approach Tree 5. See Numberphile -- Tree G64 for a really fun and technical explanation of where they fall in the infinity system.
TREE TREE 3 times. Statements such as the universe itself isn't large enough to write down Graham's number would mean more if the font size the writer is using was mentioned. What is the smallest font permitted? How many peas you could put in a bottle depends on the size of the bottle and the size of the pea. If each character was no larger than 1 Planck length, still wouldn't even make a dent.. Absolutely mind dissolvingly, unfathomably, ludicrously large. Question: What font-size is assumed when it's said that the observable universe isn't big enough to write Graham's number?
Answer: Writing Graham's number as a 1 followed by zeros, suppose you could write one of the zeros in every Planck volume in the observable universe.
There aren't enough of them to write it. If, instead of 1 followed by a string of zeros, you wrote "A trillion trillion trillion How small is a Planck volume? It's a hundredth of a millionth of a trillionth of the volume of a proton. In fact, not only could you not write Graham's number by writing a zero or or a letter of "trillion" in every Planck volume in the universe. It's said that you couldn't even write the number of digits in the number of digits,.
But I can guarantee the first claim: You can't write the Graham number even if you could write a zero, or a letter in "trillion" in each Plank volume of the observable universe,. How many orders can objects be arranged in? The number is greater than the number of Planck volumes in the universe,. Say you numbered and listed all those orders. How many orders could that list be arranged in? The number of orders for that would be too big to be written even if you could write a zero or a letter of the word "trillion" in every Planck volume in the observable universe.
You know that scan-pattern called the QR code, that accesses an advertiser's website? At least one kind of QR code scan pattern uses a 35X35 square pattern of smaller squares. In how many orders could the world's human population be arranged?
What ACT target score should you be aiming for? How to Get a Perfect 4. How to Write an Amazing College Essay. A Comprehensive Guide. Choose Your Test. How Many Zeros in a Googol? A Googolplex? What Is a Googol? What Is a Googolplex? Summary: How Many Zeros in a Googolplex? What's Next? Have friends who also need help with test prep?
Share this article! Christine Sarikas. About the Author. Search the Blog Search. Find Out How. Get the latest articles and test prep tips! Looking for Graduate School Test Prep?
0コメント